On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Eric Scouten wrote:
Jeff Robbins wrote:
And just for reference, Mambo features an entire website dedicated to its modules, components, and themes: http://mamboforge.net
I've noticed that site as well. I haven't dug into that site too deeply, but it creates the *impression* at least that (1) the Mambo community is large (larger than Drupal's community)
This is probably true.
and (2) there's room for all levels of module development and the status of each project is well understood.
I find it fairly easy through SourceForge's interface (and by extension MamboForge and others like it) to figure out what's useful and what's crap (mostly by looking at a module's activity level and status). It's much harder in Drupal, despite the relatively small number of modules (as compared to SF projects!), to figure out what's useful.
DrupalForge anyone?
The problem is not a dandy name, the problem is that there is no code to allow module classification. Cheers, Gerhard