On 14 Apr 2005, at 20:26, Nedjo Rogers wrote:
A patch I proposed nine weeks ago to improve project the project issue review process went nowhere.
Issue: http://www.drupal.org/node/17052 Patch: http://drupal.org/files/issues/admin_configurable_status_options.patch
But (not to be deterred, since I still believe barriers to community participation in the development process are the most pressing issues in Drupal development) I have another, much more modest suggestion, that I think could help move things along without (gasp) changing code.
I think I'm OK with your patch, I just haven't had time to look at it yet or test it -- and apparently no one else had either. While the screenshot looks nice, it is unclear what happens to the existing issues when status fields are added, removed or renamed. I have been meaning to test this. With or without these fields, I can usually tell when a patch had a _good_ review or when it has been thumbed up with no or minimal inspection/testing. -- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/