7 Oct
2005
7 Oct
'05
8:11 p.m.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Earl Dunovant wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't, but...
On 10/7/05, Gerhard Killesreiter <killesreiter@physik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
For example the new SPAM module is under the BSD license. The new
GPL compatible.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
I don't see anything that compels sharing of modifications like GPL does.
The GPL does that only if you distribute the code. Many people miss that details.
And it's real simple...no place to hide missing meanings.
So...what does "GPL compatible" mean?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatIsCompatible Cheers, Gerhard