[consulting] managing many sites

[Jason Flatt]

On Tuesday 13 December 2005 01:32, Dries Buytaert wrote:
>
> Furthermore, maintaining individual sites using CVS has a
> number of additional advantages: (i) you can upgrade one site at a
> time (no mass breakage), (ii) CVS will attempt to merge custom
> changes, (iii) you can get bugfixes before a new release is made
> available, and much more.  There might be exceptions to this rule but
> for nearly all use cases, CVS is superior compared to a multi-site
> setup. Period.

Sorry to be so slow on this, I've been rather busy lately.

I've always equated CVS to being unstable.  (For example, E17.)  Are you 
saying that Drupal CVS is rather stable and not any more likely to break a 
site than the "official" stable versions?

-- 
Jason Flatt
http://www.oadae.net/
jason at oadae.net