[consulting] Drupal considerd dangerous
kieran at civicspacelabs.org
Thu Dec 21 23:06:28 UTC 2006
On Dec 21, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Kieran Lal wrote:
>>> There are no qualifications or "it's not always the best choice"
>>> honest comments anywhere to be found.
>> By targeting specific uses we tried to highlight it's strengths.
>> Highlighting weaknesses is not very useful as it's frequently the
>> limitations of the users ability to use a tool that are the real
> Well, there we have it: "There are no weaknesses in Drupal, just
> weaknesses in users' ability to master it."
> You have me at a loss for words, I honestly have no answer to
> so incredibly arrogant.
My point was that Drupal can be made to do different things depending
on the skill level of the person using it. In a core maintainer's
hands it can do somethings. In a new user hands it can do another.
The difference is based on the skill level of the user which makes it
very difficult to make blanket statements about it's weaknesses.
>>> Small businesses are explicitly mentioned as a target group for whom
>>> Drupal is the right answer.
>>> In fact, the page offers no realistic appraisal of what Drupal
>>> do well, which is also what people coming to such a page are
>>> looking for.
>> What do you suggest?
> The kind of honesty that Bill suggested. An acknowledgement that
> isn't for everyone, and a frank analysis of its advantages and
> drawbacks. Respect for users' intelligence rather than contempt.
> Emphasis on understanding what users need, rather than what you expect
> of them.
Let me know when you write that page or edit the one I wrote and I'll
> - Evan
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org
More information about the consulting