[consulting] Re: CMS comparison

Steve Hanson shanson at cruiskeenconsulting.com
Tue May 9 19:49:49 UTC 2006


Eric Lawrence wrote:
>
>
>
>
>     Message: 10
>     Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:00:00 -0700
>     From: Kieran Lal <kieran at civicspacelabs.org
>     <mailto:kieran at civicspacelabs.org>>
>     Subject: Re: [consulting] CMS comparison
>     To: A list for Drupal consultants and Drupal service/hosting providers
>             <consulting at drupal.org <mailto:consulting at drupal.org>>
>     Message-ID:
>     <59AC46E7-DF91-4E5A-9696-1E395A730A9D at civicspacelabs.org
>     <mailto:59AC46E7-DF91-4E5A-9696-1E395A730A9D at civicspacelabs.org>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>     On May 9, 2006, at 9:45 AM, John Sechrest wrote:
>
>     >
>     > Today I saw the article about CMS War:
>     >
>     > http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2006/05/09/cms-war/
>     >
>     > And it looks from the graph that drupal is doing well, but that
>     > Joomla is doing better.
>     >
>     >
>
Lets also not lose sight of the fact that these are Alexa statistics -
so they are probably a little skewed.  For example, nobody who isn't
using Internet Explorer will ever show up in them.  Nor will anyone who
doesn't want to have the Alexa toolbar in their web browser.  I don't
have any way to prove it, but I think this in itself probably makes some
products score higher than others. 

It's always hard to know what any of these browser-based statistics
really mean.


-- 
Steve Hanson
Principal Consultant
Cruiskeen Consulting LLC - http://www.cruiskeenconsulting.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shanson.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 156 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/consulting/attachments/20060509/049ff86c/shanson.vcf


More information about the consulting mailing list