[consulting] copyright policies

[Kevin Amerson]

Yes that's a good point Boris, saying that something is GPL and available
for the public is quite different than actually following that and making it
publicly available.  I hope that the latter is the case here.

Kevin

On Jan 24, 2008 12:35 PM, Boris Mann <boris at bryght.com> wrote:

>
> On 24-Jan-08, at 9:00 AM, Kevin Amerson wrote:
>
> Does the non-compete cover this scenario?
>
> Client A pays you for a solution to problem A that directly ties to their
> business.  You retain the ability to reuse the code as you stated.
>
> Client B is a direct competitor to Client A and comes to you for a
> solution to the same problem.
>
> You gladly hand them the same code tailored to them.
>
>
> Or rather, after Client A, you submit it to Drupal.org with sponsorship
> from Client A.
>
> Client B wants extra functionality. You add it, and Client A gets it "for
> free".
>
>
> Who is competing with who?  In essence, Client A just paid to help out
> their competitor, Client B.
>
> I was a consultant for over 4 years and never under any circumstances
> would we be allowed to reuse a solution built for one client for another
> client.  We were expensive, however, the client kept everything always.
>
>
>
> --
> Boris Mann
> Office 604-682-2889
> http://www.bryght.com
> Jabber boris at bryght.com
> Skype borismann
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/consulting/attachments/20080124/9b3c892e/attachment.htm