[development] confused: beta-1 release != head?
gabor at hojtsy.hu
Thu Dec 15 22:11:46 UTC 2005
> +1 for the sake of +1...
> What's wrong with nightly tarballs?
If you download some ....-nightly.tgz then it is fine. If you download a
... x.y.z.tgz, then you are not going to think it is rebuilt
periodically (with the same x.y.z suffix). The same goes for the beta
suffix. I am also +1 on keeing the named tarballs static. We can have
nightly tarballs as long as they are marked and named as such.
More information about the development