[drupal-devel] [feature] Allow node_load($nid)
walkah
drupal-devel at drupal.org
Sat Jul 16 12:56:02 UTC 2005
Issue status update for
http://drupal.org/node/25634
Post a follow up:
http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/25634
Project: Drupal
Version: cvs
Component: node system
Category: feature requests
Priority: normal
Assigned to: chx
Reported by: chx
Updated by: walkah
Status: patch
let me weigh in +1 on the mixed parameter side ... let's get away from
blowing up backwards compatibility unless it's justified and/or
unavoidable for the sake of progress. please :)
walkah
Previous comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 23, 2005 - 13:37 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load.patch (2.23 KB)
I am fed up writing node_load(array('nid' => $nid)) all the time.
BTW. if this is accepted, next is node_view to accept a $nid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 23, 2005 - 13:41 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load_0.patch (2.23 KB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 23, 2005 - 13:53 : adrian
I am going to +1 this.
node_load(x) is much more natural to type. Having it use an array if
found is useful too though.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:00 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load_1.patch (27.89 KB)
Dries, if I remember correctly, you favoured this approach.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:07 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load_2.patch (27.97 KB)
PHPdoc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:14 : Jose A Reyero
+1
It's not only about lazy developers -which I am ;-)- it's also about
shorter code => less errors, easier to catch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:17 : chx
The patch and its consequences makes me love the version at
http://drupal.org/node/25634#comment-33584 more, but Dries will be the
one to decide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:31 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load_3.patch (18.95 KB)
A few things slipped in from another patch which should not be here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2005 - 12:33 : chx
Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/node_load_4.patch (15.31 KB)
Same problem as above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 15, 2005 - 00:10 : clydefrog
I like this! Is there a similar issue for user_load()?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2005 - 01:33 : Steven
I definitely prefer the version where we simply allow $conditions to be
passed as an integer, rather than introducing additional parameters.
It matches PHP's convention of having "mixed" argument types for some
functions for shorthands (e.g. str_replace allows array arguments to
compact multiple replacements in one statement). And not unimportant:
it does not break backwards compatibility for what it essentially
syntactic sugar.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2005 - 02:58 : chx
Steven. Dries did not like that version hence the additional parameter.
Dries, now that even Steven is on my side, would you please reconsider
:) ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2005 - 04:01 : adrian
I concurr about the mixed parameter.
More information about the drupal-devel
mailing list