[development] Help with getting CVS HEAD -> DRUPAL-4-6
ber at webschuur.com
Thu Nov 17 16:03:27 UTC 2005
Op donderdag 17 november 2005 16:12, schreef Gerhard Killesreiter:
> Bad idea. According to the FAQ in contrib you should use -b.
> We use branches or telling 4.6 and HEAD apart, not tags.
Then some CVS guru must fix: http://drupal.org/node/17570
In gebneral I think we should get rid of the distributed docs. Get rid of the
textfiles in CVS. If we have uptodate stuff online, that is searchable,
bookmarkable, etc, then who reads them in CVS anyway?
I vote for removing all textfile docs, except the licence statement from CVS
[ Bèr Kessels | Drupal services www.webschuur.com ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20051117/db3b52de/attachment.pgp
More information about the development