[development] nodeapi image concept (request for feedback)

[Walt Daniels]

I agree, gallery is not really core material, but uploading images and using
them on various pages is. To use them they need to be browsable by various
mechanisms, e.g. owned by current user or taxonomy. Images need copyright
restrictions, e.g. by user, public domain, creative commons, that get
assigned at upload time.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: development-bounces at drupal.org 
> [mailto:development-bounces at drupal.org] On Behalf Of Earl Miles
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:37 PM
> To: development at drupal.org; jeff at viapositiva.net
> Subject: Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for 
> feedback)
> 
> At the same time I would also separate out the gallery 
> portion of the code; perhaps making it a separate module 
> (image.module +
> image_gallery.module) which would allow alternative galleries 
> (shazamgallery for example) to have more freedom without 
> worrying about the default image gallery stuff. Taxonomy is 
> not always appropriate for galleries.
> 
> Jeff Eaton wrote:
> > I think it's exactly what a lot of people have been asking for in 
> > image.module for a long time -- definitely more useful for the 
> > majority of people than the gallery function. Like 
> uploading, it can 
> > be turned off on a nodetype by nodetype basis, so nothing 
> is *forced* 
> > on users, neh?
> >  
> > I'm curious whether it could be used by a module I'm 
> working on -- a 
> > 'graphic novel' nodetype that would have 2 explicitly named images 
> > associated with it (one for the left page and one for the 
> right page 
> > of a two-page spread).
> >  
> > --Jeff
> >
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     *From:* James Gilliland [mailto:neclimdul at gmail.com]
> >     *Sent:* Sunday, April 02, 2006 12:36 PM
> >     *To:* development at drupal.org
> >     *Subject:* Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for
> >     feedback)
> >
> >     I'd like to see it there
> >
> >     On 4/2/06, *James Walker* <walkah at walkah.net
> >     <mailto:walkah at walkah.net>> wrote:
> >
> >         On 31-Mar-06, at 5:25 PM, Nedjo Rogers wrote:
> >
> >         > There's an issue on the image module for moving 
> to nodeapi:
> >         >
> >         > http://drupal.org/node/43628
> >
> >         Yeah, after looking through the code, I'm inclined 
> to say this
> >         makes
> >         sense directly in image.module . Do others have a 
> strong opinion?
> >
> >         --
> >         James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah at walkah.net
> >         <mailto:xmpp:walkah at walkah.net>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>