[development] Administration page patch committed
gabor at hojtsy.hu
Thu Aug 3 21:48:22 UTC 2006
Since Copyleft does not specify the GPL license explicitly, it can be
understood differently. The output of the theme should not suggest
otherwise. A GPL License.txt is added by default to project downloads, go
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Gary Feldman wrote:
> Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>> Doh, this theme is copyleft licensed...
>> Some portions of this website's design are part of the Sands theme for
>> Drupal, which is copyleft (c) 2005-2006 Samat Jain. All rights reserved.
>> This theme should change license, or should be removed from the Drupal
>> repository, since it does not comply to our policies. It should be GPL to
>> stay in contrib. It definitely is not core compatible license wise.
> Copyleft isn't a license. It's a buzzword used by the GNU folks as a
> catch-all for licenses that meet their goals, which obviously includes the
> GPLs. A quick look at the CVS repository for it shows that there is no
> license.txt file, and the few files that I checked have no copyright notice.
> So I think it's clear that if any license applies, it will be the GPL as
> required by Drupal's upload policy.
More information about the development