[development] Strip out theme functions into a .theme file

[Adrian Rossouw]

well. additionally the code from the templates might even be cached to the
db (we actually had this implemented already)

an opcode cache would make this unneeded though.

On 8/4/06, Bèr Kessels <ber at webschuur.com> wrote:
>
> Op vrijdag 4 augustus 2006 12:23, schreef Dries Buytaert:
> > We did some preliminary benchmarks and noticed a 10% performance
> > cost. This cost was not caused by fopen() but by the way variables
> > were handled. This might be less of an issue with this patch.
> >
> > It's well worth exploring this further, IMO, but rather than guessing
> > we should collect factual data.
>
>
> Something that is *very* important when benching fopens-freads is the
> underlying file system and the activity of the HD.
>
> I was told that a fopen - fread (php include() ) often does a file lock
> too.
> On a server where there is a lot of disc activity this may idle your app
> for
> seconds or even longer, since PHP will idle/wait untill it may actually
> open
> the file.
>
> So in short: make sure you benchmark this on a system that is apropriate.
> simply benchmarking it on a single site on your localhost will not
> suffice!
>
> --
> | Bèr Kessels | webschuur.com | Drupal, Joomla and Ruby on Rails web
> development |
> | Jabber & Google Talk: ber at jabber.webschuur.com |
> | http://bler.webschuur.com | http://www.webschuur.com |
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20060804/87586cfd/attachment-0001.htm