[development] The www-subdomain (WAS: Re: Patching settings.php)
Morbus Iff
morbus at disobey.com
Fri Aug 4 12:57:12 UTC 2006
>> Personally I'm with Freso - I see no point in the www and feel that
>> the site should silently drop it if a user inserts it (much like
And, for what it's worth, your beloved leader
suggests tolerance, not blanket redirecting (though,
yes, they refer to their "ideal" situation as a redirect):
To that end, we make the modest proposal that
website makers configure their main sites to be
accessible by domain.com as well as
www.domain.com. ... However, any site that takes
in traffic one way or the other on both the www
host and the bare domain are acceptable here.
... We understand that this sort of
configuration is not appropriate for every
website. For example, a domain may require the
webserver to be stored on a different machine
than the domain root server. ... In fact,
several websites choose to forward traffic from
domain.com to www.domain.com for branding
reasons and that's just fine with us. As long as
they don't simply block all HTTP traffic on the
bare domain name, they're OK in our book.
--
Morbus Iff ( the power of grayskull compels you! )
Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus
More information about the development
mailing list