[development] Confused: package value of info files
Derek Wright
drupal at dwwright.net
Thu Dec 21 04:11:25 UTC 2006
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> But others have already populated the package value incorrectly.
this is a good argument for submitting issues and patches that fix
the incorrectly classified .info files, not for changing core to try
to defend ourselves from poorly classified modules. contrib is a
vast, dangerous place, full of varying levels of quality and sanity
of the code. the code for drupal core would have to be at least 10
times larger, more complicated, and slower, if it had to try to
protect itself from every stupid thing some contrib author decided to
do. ;)
there's no shame in "other", and there's no shame in having lots of
modules in there. remember, 4.7.x just has everything, core/contrib/
CCK/OG/other/whatever all in 1 giant, alphabetical list. so, even
just "Core-Optional" vs. "Core-Required" vs. "Other" is a vast
usability improvement right there. for extra-credit, all the CCK
fields can be in another group, etc, etc, but we should aim for 3-7
groups total, not 15-20. i don't think we need a feature to
automatically re-classify single-group modules back into other... no
one should be distributing modules in their own group in the first
place. if they do, it's their problem, not core's.
cheers,
-derek
More information about the development
mailing list