[development] Story vs Page - Again

[Earnie Boyd]

Quoting Khalid B <kb at 2bits.com>:

>
>
> The reason they exist is historical, and is just for flexibility.
>

I understand the historical bit; it is the reason for the Again in the 
subject line.

> Having two content types, even though identical in fields, provides more
> flexibility in workflow. For example, one can be moderated by default,
> and have comments on by default, the other can be not so.
>

But page and story have no difference as installed.  So perhaps story 
should be installed with no comments specified.  If it were there would 
at least be a difference between the two.  Maybe even have the "Create 
a new revision" set for story.

> In 5.0, you can define your own type, or delete story if you don't like it.
>

That is too obvious.  I think page should be locked and not allowed to 
be deleted so that the end user doesn't screw himself.

Earnie