[development] Story vs Page - Again
earnie at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Dec 22 14:46:51 UTC 2006
Quoting Khalid B <kb at 2bits.com>:
> The reason they exist is historical, and is just for flexibility.
I understand the historical bit; it is the reason for the Again in the
> Having two content types, even though identical in fields, provides more
> flexibility in workflow. For example, one can be moderated by default,
> and have comments on by default, the other can be not so.
But page and story have no difference as installed. So perhaps story
should be installed with no comments specified. If it were there would
at least be a difference between the two. Maybe even have the "Create
a new revision" set for story.
> In 5.0, you can define your own type, or delete story if you don't like it.
That is too obvious. I think page should be locked and not allowed to
be deleted so that the end user doesn't screw himself.
More information about the development