[development] blocks by role in 4.7.0? RTBC?
Robert Douglass
r.douglass at onlinehome.de
Sat Mar 25 08:53:14 UTC 2006
Tough situation. We've ranted over and over .... "Read our lips, no new
features". I can't help but think that making an exception, just days
away from the release candidate, is a bad idea. I *love* this feature.
There are a dozen other features that I love as well, though. New
features, in my opinion, are what we have Drupal 4.8 for.
Let's get 4.7 out the door and then decide to speed up our devel-release
cycle.
-Robert
Derek Wright wrote:
> we need to be able to control what blocks are visible based on role,
> and it should be in core, not via php hackery. there's already an
> issue about this:
>
> http://drupal.org/node/18018
>
> apparently, the only reason this never got committed, in spite of much
> interest and effort, is this potentially innocent question from dries:
>
> "Could we align the page-visibility code with this code, so they are
> more conform/consistent/similar?" (comment #46)
>
> does anyone here know what he's talking about? ;) note: he didn't
> change the status to "code needs work" or anything. earlier in the
> same issue, he said:
>
> "Where did I say that getting 4.7 out is less important?" (#32)
>
> clearly, he agrees (along with probably dozens of us on this list, and
> maybe hundreds, if not thousands, of drupal site admins in the world)
> that we should add this feature before 4.7.0.
>
> i updated the patch to be current with CVS head and attached that to
> comment #49. i think it's RTBC, but didn't feel like i was in a
> position to set the status to that on my own. ;)
>
> can some of the heavy-weights around here please comment on the issue,
> ideally, by changing the status to RTBC (or better yet, "fixed" after
> it's been applied)? ;)
>
>
> thanks!
> -derek (dww)
>
>
> p.s. killes just replied after i composed this message, and i
> re-rolled another patch based on his feedback. but i'm still sending
> it to the list for community opinions and support on this. ;)
>
>
>
>
More information about the development
mailing list