[development] RFC: Candidate 'premium' modules
nji at njivy.org
Tue May 16 02:20:31 UTC 2006
On May 15, 2006, at 8:26 PM, James Walker wrote:
> On 15-May-06, at 8:30 PM, Karthik wrote:
>> Premium modules are those that are:
>> a) release-critical - A new version of Drupal cannot be released
>> unless these are up-to-date.
>> b) quality controlled - these will be 'core modules' in all but name.
>> c) well maintained - HEAD, current release and previous release
>> all be maintained preferably by a number of maintainers.
> How do we keep track of which these are? Who decides? trackback,
> e.g. is afaik currently unmaintained... etc.
> I do, however, think that somehow giving folks an idea of which
> modules are worth trying before others is a good one. But this
> sounds like a sticky situation at best... tread lightly.
I am more interested in application-specific Drupal bundles and
bundle maintainers. For example, we could have a forum-centric
bundle, a blog-centric bundle, and a brochure-ware bundle.
But bundles could easily become forks, in which I am not interested.
More information about the development