[development] RFC: Candidate 'premium' modules

James Walker walkah at walkah.net
Tue May 16 01:26:35 UTC 2006

On 15-May-06, at 8:30 PM, Karthik wrote:

> Premium modules are those that are:
> a) release-critical - A new version of Drupal cannot be released
> unless these are up-to-date.
> b) quality controlled - these will be 'core modules' in all but name.
> c) well maintained - HEAD, current release and previous release should
> all be maintained preferably by a number of maintainers.

How do we keep track of which these are? Who decides? trackback, e.g.  
is afaik currently unmaintained... etc.

I do, however, think that somehow giving folks an idea of which  
modules are worth trying before others is a good one. But this sounds  
like a sticky situation at best... tread lightly.

More information about the development mailing list