[development] Commercially oriented modules (was MicrosoftSQLServer)

Ray Zimmerman rz10 at cornell.edu
Tue May 23 16:06:34 UTC 2006

Speaking of updating the FAQ or Handbook to include some  
clarifications related to impacts of GPL ... there is http:// 


On May 23, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Earnest Berry wrote:

> Perhaps if/after a conclusion is made, a summary of this discussion  
> should
> be placed on in the FAQ or Handbook, so that others can reference the
> "general accepted policy" regarding this subject? I know that it  
> has come up
> a few times and it would be nice to have one document to refer and
> change/update as necessary; keep everyone on the same page.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: development-bounces at drupal.org [mailto:development- 
> bounces at drupal.org]
> On Behalf Of AjK
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:49 AM
> To: development at drupal.org; rob at robshouse.net
> Subject: RE: [development] Commercially oriented modules (was
> MicrosoftSQLServer)
> Robert,
>> Let them
>> worry about the ramifications of GPL; if they screw up we get more  
>> open
>> source software =)
> Thanks for clearing this up for me, personally at least. I'm a third
> party integrator and have no ties with the Nedstat system. As such
> I don't want to get either Drupal or Nedstat into murky waters as
> a third party. So it seems to me at least I won't be committing my
> module to avoid any further problems.
> best regards
> --AjK

More information about the development mailing list