[development] death to "x.y.z" version is now inevitable

Moshe Weitzman weitzman at tejasa.com
Wed Nov 15 03:02:39 UTC 2006

> 6.x-dev vs. 5.x-dev is great, as it clearly defines "this is something 
> that should get fixed in this release" vs. "this is something we should 
> put off until the next release."

isn't that basically what status=postponed means? we should remove 6.x-dev 
or postponed, IMO.

More information about the development mailing list