[development] Is emailpage abandoned [not any more!]
eric at openflows.org
Thu Nov 16 22:43:24 UTC 2006
At 5:32 PM -0500 11/16/06, Darren Oh wrote:
>On Nov 16, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Eric Goldhagen wrote:
>>At 4:57 PM -0500 11/16/06, Darren Oh wrote:
>>>The Forward project has been active for over a year. They have
>>>excellent support for upgrading from emailpage. So emailpage is
>>>ready to retire. I have cleared out the issue queue and applied
>>>patches for the 4.7 and 4.6 branches. The project description now
>>>advises users to upgrade to Forward.
>>Since emailpage will be going away, might it be a wise idea to
>>change the name of forward to emailpage or email_node? Emailpage
>>just seems like so much more intuitive a name for this
>>functionality. forward as a module name does not imply the ability
>>to email a page from a site. Without reading the full description
>>of the module, will people think of using it for that based on a
>>quick read of the module list.
>>just a thought.
>Email_node is more accurate. There is no module that sends actual
>pages. I'll contribute one if anyone is interested.
right, I should have said "email the contents of a node/page" not
"email a page"
but, i do think that email_node is a better name for the module being
Openflows Community Technology Lab, Inc.
New York | Toronto | Montreal | Vienna
People are intelligent. Machines are tools.
More information about the development