[development] code names for core releases?

Frando (Franz Heinzmann) frando at xcite-online.de
Wed Sep 20 15:36:05 UTC 2006

Johan Forngren schrieb:
> 2006/9/20, Frando (Franz Heinzmann) <frando at xcite-online.de 
> <mailto:frando at xcite-online.de>>:
>      > This issue is about clarifying which head we are talking about for
>      > future generations. So why not just "4.7 HEAD" or "5.0 HEAD"?
>      > It would contract to something cutesie like 4.7H, 5.0H of course.
>     Again, as 5 people already stated, until 3 weeks ago we didn't know
>     wether what is now known as 5.0 would be 4.8 or 5.0.
> How about last stable realse plus H/HEAD then? 4.7H would be the current 

I think this would be confusing, as there is already a 4.7 HEAD version 
(the HEAD of the 4.7-branch). So if you're talking of 4.7 HEAD, I'd 
think of the latest version of the 4.7 branch and not the HEAD of the TRUNK.

We could just use code names ;)


More information about the development mailing list