[development] db_rewrite_sql
Wim Leers
bashratthesneaky at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 13:20:22 UTC 2007
I think it's inevitable for a project as modular as Drupal and with
the amount of modules Drupal has, to eventually need a built-in query
builder, to keep things maintainable and/or to lift the project to
"the next level". The question is though, how doable is this? And are
enough people willing to work on it? My knowledge about query
builders and SQL is too limited, but I imagine that you can't write
this in 2 weeks with say, 10 developers working on it. Something like
this needs time, a lot of time.
Not to mention we also have to somehow provide enough context
information for other modules to hook in whenever desired.
If it's implemented extremely well, we could simply *always* write
"Drupal SQL", and let the query builder worry about the specific SQL
(MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc.). That would rock! But what would
the performance implications be? I think that a complete query
builder in Drupal core might slow down things too much? Or something
like the Boost module would have to get in core, to balance the
performance again (virtually no load for anonymous visitors)?
Just some thoughts...
Wim Leers
On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:42 , jp.stacey at torchbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> My opinion on that all depends on what you mean by a query builder.
>>> :-) Could you elucidate?
>> along the lines of how views does it.
>
> I'd envisage any query builder would be more heavily tied to the
> structure of the underlying database than views.
>
> Rather than adding extra node-based or categories-based options, you'd
> explicitly add extra database tables by name, and specify quasi-SQL
> JOIN
> conditions and WHERE filtering. At the end of it all it could spit out
> some fairly vanilla SQL that matched the structure you'd set up.
> Does that
> sound right?
>
> (Of course, query builders aren't great at actually optimising the
> SQL.)
>
> Cheers,
> J-P
More information about the development
mailing list