[development] should tinymce get a new maintainer tinymce
boris at bryght.com
Mon Feb 5 22:19:29 UTC 2007
On 2/5/07, sime <info at urbits.com> wrote:
> 2c not yet spent?
> If you disagree with how a maintainer operates, this is no reason for a
> coup. I believe that if negotiations fail, the next step should be to fork.
Yep. We have just not had any (2 way) communication yet, which is the
frustrating part. And really, really really don't want to have to
Most people (== devs running it for clients) are running the "patched"
version that is the 4.7 version updated for 5.0.
San Francisco 415-367-3595
More information about the development