[development] Seems I need to take sandbox in my own hands

[Ankur Rishi]

+1

Sorry, if i've joined the conversation a bit too late.

On 12/17/06, Boris Mann <boris at bryght.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/06, inkfree press <inkfree at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > (Note:
> > Perhaps re-thiking the nature and purpose of, and therefore the on-server
> > handling of, the sandbox space will also suggest some alternative end-user
> > interface to the downloadable-accessible contents.  If it does not make
> > technical sense to provide end-user access through the current web
> > interface, then perhaps some additional "public" flags could allow
> > individual authors the choice to make certain content end-user
> accessible.)
>
> No. You're a "dev" if you can use CVS to access stuff. You're an "end user"
> if you click on links to download modules. The stuff there is "public" and
> anyone that knows CVS can go and go it
>
> Many threads, all veering off target. I think we've got consensus that:
> * sandboxes should stick around
> * we'd like to be flexible about what's in there for community sharing, but
> policy needs updating
> * maybe they should move to a separate repo
>
>
> --
> Boris Mann
> Vancouver 778-896-2747
> San Francisco 415-367-3595
> Skype borismann
> http://www.bryght.com