[development] Core: DRUPAL-5 branched

[FGM]

Indeed, since all answers simultaneously mentioned that it was better to
keep it online, and that this was for maintenance of older sites or
migrations to more recent versions, including a specific obsolescence
warning on the 4.6 pages makes perfect sense.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neil Drumm" <drumm at delocalizedham.com>
To: <development at drupal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: [development] Core: DRUPAL-5 branched


> Derek Wright wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:55 PM, FGM wrote:
> >
> >> Are there any reasons for actually removing it ?
> >
> > agreed.  i'd vote in favor of keeping 4.6 there.  it's not like any of
> > the UI bits on api.d.o would become monstrously difficult to navigate
> > with 4 versions of core to choose from.
>
> That is what I expected. 4.6 is now unsupported, maybe there should be a
> drupal_set_message(t('deprecated/unsupported...')).
[...]