[development] Core: DRUPAL-5 branched
fgm at osinet.fr
Wed Jan 17 07:48:00 UTC 2007
Indeed, since all answers simultaneously mentioned that it was better to
keep it online, and that this was for maintenance of older sites or
migrations to more recent versions, including a specific obsolescence
warning on the 4.6 pages makes perfect sense.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Drumm" <drumm at delocalizedham.com>
To: <development at drupal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: [development] Core: DRUPAL-5 branched
> Derek Wright wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:55 PM, FGM wrote:
> >> Are there any reasons for actually removing it ?
> > agreed. i'd vote in favor of keeping 4.6 there. it's not like any of
> > the UI bits on api.d.o would become monstrously difficult to navigate
> > with 4 versions of core to choose from.
> That is what I expected. 4.6 is now unsupported, maybe there should be a
More information about the development