[development] KEY node_type (type(4)),

Barry Jaspan barry at jaspan.org
Fri Jul 13 12:14:35 UTC 2007

> Is there a specific reason to use type(4)? Shouldn't we
> use type?

FYI, I have no idea why it is this way and see no reason no to use the
full type field in the index.  The D6 schema preserves the type(4)
index only because it was present in D5.



More information about the development mailing list