[development] KEY node_type (type(4)),

[Barry Jaspan]

> Is there a specific reason to use type(4)? Shouldn't we
> use type?

FYI, I have no idea why it is this way and see no reason no to use the
full type field in the index.  The D6 schema preserves the type(4)
index only because it was present in D5.

Thanks,

Barry