[development] Documentation proposal: Forms

[Earl Miles]

Larry Garfield wrote:
> I like this idea, including Jeff's extension.  (Forms that use 
> system_settings_form() would probably not have @see tags.)  If there's no 
> objection I'll try to do this while I'm busy moving things around for the 
> page split stuff.  (Which I started with aggregator only to find that it's 
> already broken beyond belief, so I get to fix it along the way.  Whee!)

Yea, I was working on templatizing aggregator when I found out the same thing, 
and then chx told me you were working on splitting aggregator. I'm curious if 
we should combine our work into a single patch. I got about halfway and 
stopped, so I've still got a fair bit of work to do to finish the templates.