[development] Requiring node revisions

[Derek Wright]

On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Khalid Baheyeldin wrote:

> Maybe I just don't want the overhead?
>
> That would be a neat thing to have.

i hope you don't take this the wrong way, but i don't think you grasp  
how {node_revisions} currently works.  you get the overhead of the  
JOIN on {node_revisions} no matter what (though as David points out,  
this is mostly free, since we rarely/never try to WHERE or ORDER BY  
on things from {node_revisions}).  the only overhead of this change  
is the extra rows in the {node_revisions} table, and the thread is  
already discussing interesting ways to limit/reduce *that* overhead  
for sites that care about such things.

-derek