[development] Requiring node revisions

[Larry Garfield]

OK, I sit corrected then. :-)  However, some sort of "not a real revision" function would be useful for Drupal anyway if we go the "all revisions" route.

--Larry Garfield

On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:35:16 -0500, David Strauss <david at fourkitchens.com> wrote:
> Minor edits are only marked as such for human interpretation. There is
> no difference in the software handling.
> 
> Take it from someone with commit access to MediaWiki. :-)
> 
> Larry Garfield wrote:
>> Codex (Wikipedia) does something similar.  It has a "this is a minor
> edit" checkbox that, I presume, skips the versioning process.  Some
> well-labeled option like that could be useful if we go the all-revisions
> route.
>> 
>> --Larry Garfield
>> 
>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:35:22 +0200, Stefan Nagtegaal
> <development at robuustdesign.nl> wrote:
>>> maybe I'm saying something stupid, but wouldn't it make more sense to
>>> move the revision enable/disable option to the 'admin/content/types/
>>> $type' in the first place?
>>> if people disable it for a node type, it doesn't need to be displayed
>>> any more on "node/add/$type".
>>>
>>> When it is enabled for the node-type, perhaps a checkbox to "Do not
>>> create a new revision" (with a access check for 'bypass revisions')
>>> makes sense?
>>>
>>> It are just some thoughts, and perhaps not the right. But to me it
>>> makes more sense..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>> 
> 
> 
>