[development] Fun CCK idea.

Sean Robertson seanr at ngpsoftware.com
Thu May 31 20:19:44 UTC 2007

You're creating a new flexinode to replace CCK?  That really makes me 
nervous - going from flexinode to CCK the first time was a pain in the 
ass because there was no easy upgrade path.  Why not just fix CCK 
instead of pushing people back and forth?  Or am I misinterpreting you? 
  Right now I'm pretty happy with CCK and the modules that work with it 
and I don't relish the idea of ditching that.

Bèr Kessels wrote:
> Op donderdag 31 mei 2007, schreef Bèr Kessels:
>> Part of this is already implemented in my
>> probably-never-to-be-released-because-too-litle-quality-time flexinode2,
>> the superceder of CCK.
>> Baked right into the core of it, in fact.
> wrong quote. This was not reply to CRUD, but to the idea of letting modules 
> define content types (and fields).
> The crud is somthing that is already in flexinode1, so it will be in 2 too.
> Bèr

Sean Robertson
Web Developer
NGP Software, Inc.
seanr at ngpsoftware.com
(202) 686-9330

More information about the development mailing list