[development] Early Drupal 6 review from Chris Messina
Gerhard Killesreiter
gerhard at killesreiter.de
Sun Nov 11 00:12:13 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Strauss schrieb:
> There are many valuable comments in there, but the review completely
Yes. I never said that all of it would be irrelevant, btw.
But I do think that he is concentrating too much on the needs of a
first-time user.
> butchers vocabularies and terms. It suggests calling both "categories,"
> which would add a whole new level of ambiguity. It makes me want to
> rename "Categories" to something like "Classification" just to avoid the
> whole issue of expecting an interface to add categories.
I never agreed to the renaming of Taxonomy to Categories in the first
place. :p
I think it was done in the light of a proposal, "Drupal is too
complicated, let's dumb it down".
> Maybe it would be valuable for Drupal to configure a vocabulary called
> "Tags" out of the box with free tagging that's enabled for all content
> types. But it should be clear that tagging is a *subset* of what the
> taxonomy system can do.
I think this suggestion would be good for a blogging installation profile.
> Including some basic sample content is a nice idea. It could be an
> option during the installation process. I certainly don't want sample
> content to be mandatory for new installations.
>
> But to be honest, a lot of the suggested changes would be harmful for
> how I (and my company) use Drupal, which is as a development platform
> more than a quick-and-easy CMS. I think we'd have to find some way to
> satisfy the review's concerns without confining more sophisticated use.
>
> 'Cause if someone just wants a blog, we tell them to use WordPress. No
> one benefits from making Drupal into "Super WordPress."
Well, people actually _can_ (and should!) do that by working on an
installation profile.
Sadly, there are only very few installation profiles, which indicates
that they are somehow incomplete. I wonder what is missing.
Cheers,
Gerhard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHNkjdfg6TFvELooQRAmtvAJ0f1FIjNPjjSh1g9HxjeHRyp17J8QCgkAtF
0ObbkFF7M0BPQltai5qN5yQ=
=a8Dk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the development
mailing list