[development] Fwd: Drupal.org uprade: contributed module dependencies
dries at buytaert.net
Tue Nov 27 11:37:54 UTC 2007
Oops, typo in e-mail address.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Chad Phillips -- Apartment Lines <chad at apartmentlines.com>
> Date: Mon 26 Nov 2007 20:11:40 GMT+01:00
> To: Dries Buytaert <dries at buytaert.net>
> Cc: developement at drupal.org, Derek Wright <drupal at dwwright.net>,
> James Walker <walkah at walkah.net>
> Subject: Re: Drupal.org uprade: contributed module dependencies
> our current project* roadmap to 6.x is here: http://groups.drupal.org/node/6180
> as you can see, much still remains to be done. we could shortcut
> some of that stuff and start the port to 6.x sooner, but i think
> that will only make things harder for derek and i in the long run,
> and i'd prefer not to do that.
> both of us have communicated our need for assistance in getting
> project* 6.x compat (multiple times on the mailing list, in IRC,
> etc), mentioning that it could hold up a D6 release -- but sadly,
> few have stepped up to help. on the bright side, there has been
> good recent progress in the views conversion.
> i'd say it's theoretically possible to have everything done in 4
> weeks -- but realistically, unless we get some funding, or more
> people pitching in now, it's not gonna happen.
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> traditionally, one of the requirements to release a major Drupal
>> release, is us eating our own dogfood at drupal.org. That is, we
>> always maintained a tradition of testing a major Drupal release on
>> drupal.org itself.
>> As a first release candidate is eminent, I want to reach out and
>> inquiry about the status of the contributed modules that we use on
>> drupal.org, and the project/issue related modules in particular.
>> Other notable modules that drupal.org depends on are the image
>> module, the image gallery module, the simplenews module, the port
>> stemmer module, the code filter module, and the CVS integration
>> What is the likelihood of these modules being production-ready in
>> the next 2-4 weeks? It would be great to get a status update from
>> their maintainers. We should start a concentrated effort to get
>> this modules in prime condition relatively soon. If not, they risk
>> being release blockers.
>> Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/
Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/
More information about the development