[development] RFC: drupal as a moving target
gerhard at killesreiter.de
Wed Apr 30 17:24:46 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
> etc.. but I can say that the customers that we deal with are sticking
> with 5 precisely because of the concerns on this thread.
Realistically, nobody having a working D5 site and not planning a major
overhaul will not update to D6 completely regardless of whether
views/cck/panels/holy_grail for D6 is available or not.
The question is whether new projects would use D5 or D6.
Today, I advised somebody to go with D5. This was mainly because of the
tight deadline (end of may).
If he had said "end of June" I might have considered to go with D6 (D5
would still be safer). "end of July" would be a definite yes for D6.
This would be about half half a year after D6 initially got released,
that's not too bad. D6.0 was quite unusable for larger sites anyway due
to some bugs relevant for performance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the development