[development] So why we do support postgresql?

[Andrew Fountain]

It is the other way around: Cutler supported the *minority* platform because
it would keep the code "honest" and not allow them to start relying on
Intel-only hacks.

On Jan 19, 2008 5:39 PM, Greg Knaddison - GVS <
Greg at growingventuresolutions.com> wrote:

> On Jan 19, 2008 7:14 PM, Andrew ft <andrewft at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The parallel with the MySQL/Postgres debate is clear, and the arguments
> are
> > identical.
>
> I wonder if Cutler ignored issues in the queue that needed a review
> that were spoonfed to him with patches written by someone who didn't
> use Mips but who wanted to maintain compatability.  If that were the
> case then we'd have a identical situation.
>
> </flamebait>
>
> For the people who said that these threads are useless and that Karoly
> is foolish to start them, note that the original issue finally got
> reviews and attention...after being posted here.
>
> Greg
>
> --
> Greg Knaddison
> Denver, CO | http://knaddison.com
> World Spanish Tour | http://wanderlusting.org/user/greg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20080119/8a552ad0/attachment.htm