[development] FAQ: Why is Drupal still using CVS when X is a much better choice?
gerhard at killesreiter.de
Thu Jul 31 12:09:45 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Adam Light schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter
> <gerhard at killesreiter.de> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Derek Wright schrieb:
>>> B) Who's the "we" who makes this decision?
>> The drupal.org infratructure team based on the input of the developer
> This is the kind of answer I expected to be provided, but I think
> it's way to vague.
Kieran recently explained what "infrastructure team" means:
> How would the team go about this decision? A simple vote? Does the
> majority rule, or does it need to be unanimous?
We'd need to reach an agreement in a similar way that we do reach
agreements about patches that go into Drupal: By discussion among
> Even if the answer of "who makes the decision to switch to a new
> RCS" was "Gerhard Killesreiter", at least it would be more clear
> what needs to be done to switch. As is, I still think it's totally
Since I am ultimately responsible for running drupal.org I of course
wouldn't agree to running a RCS that would likely exceed our servers
capabilities or put a lot of work on the table of the infrastructure
team by creating support requests.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the development