[development] Announcing DRUPAL-7-0-UNSTABLE-2
Larry Garfield
larry at garfieldtech.com
Mon Oct 13 19:23:45 UTC 2008
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:29:06 +0100, "Nathaniel Catchpole" <catch56 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Gábor Hojtsywrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> You say we should just move these sections around as if no hook_perm()
>> change would have happened in UNSTABLE_1?
>>
>> Gábor
>
>
> That's exactly what I mean yes. Once UNSTABLE_2 comes out, there should be
> no need for specific documentation for UNSTABLE_1 (except it's useful to
> have the division there for people upgrading from UNSTABLE_1 to
> UNSTABLE_2.
> Upgrading from 6.x to UNSTABLE_1 to UNSTABLE_2 all in one go doesn't need
> to
> be supported - same as we don't support that for sites either.
>
> Nat
In principle I'd agree with Nat here. Once UNSTABLE-2 is out, there's no reason for anyone to upgrade specifically to UNSTABLE-1. They can and should "chase unstable", as that's exactly what we want them to be doing.
--Larry Garfield
More information about the development
mailing list