[development] Announcing DRUPAL-7-0-UNSTABLE-2

Larry Garfield larry at garfieldtech.com
Mon Oct 13 19:23:45 UTC 2008

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:29:06 +0100, "Nathaniel Catchpole" <catch56 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Gábor Hojtsywrote:
>> You say we should just move these sections around as if no hook_perm()
>> change would have happened in UNSTABLE_1?
>> Gábor
> That's exactly what I mean yes. Once UNSTABLE_2 comes out, there should be
> no need for specific documentation for UNSTABLE_1 (except it's useful to
> have the division there for people upgrading from UNSTABLE_1 to
> Upgrading from 6.x to UNSTABLE_1 to UNSTABLE_2 all in one go doesn't need
> to
> be supported - same as we don't support that for sites either.
> Nat

In principle I'd agree with Nat here.  Once UNSTABLE-2 is out, there's no reason for anyone to upgrade specifically to UNSTABLE-1.  They can and should "chase unstable", as that's exactly what we want them to be doing.

--Larry Garfield

More information about the development mailing list