[development] PHP Standards Group

Cameron Eagans cweagans at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 20:57:51 UTC 2009

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that any framework that anybody would
really care about is extensible and will support extensions in different
locations. And +1 to the thing about adopting standards wherever feasible.
Cameron Eagans
Owner, Black Storms Studios, LLC

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Daniel F. Kudwien
<news at unleashedmind.com>wrote:

> > "we'll be involved in developing such standards and will
> > adopt them wherever feasible, but we do not commit to
> > following all standards if they are incompatible with
> > Drupal's basic architecture."
> >
> > --Larry Garfield
> +1  Yes, that makes sense.  I think it is what we (sometimes silently) did
> anyway.  Some of our standards are self-made (for good reason), but there
> are also a couple that were directly derived from example code snippets on
> php.net's documentation pages.  In some cases, when there was no
> consistent
> standard on php.net, we even asked them for the proper standard and to fix
> their docs.
> I'm not quite sure how they can ignore an architecture like Drupal.  I'm
> not
> sure whether I know of a PHP framework/CMS that is NOT extensible and
> doesn't support extensions to be placed in various locations, and therefore
> wouldn't support this strict filepath based namespacing.
> Thanks for staying involved, Crell!
> sun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20091111/8db82c12/attachment.html 

More information about the development mailing list