[development] D7 side effect
Sam Tresler
sam at treslerdesigns.com
Tue Dec 7 15:24:19 UTC 2010
I stand corrected, that must have changed with D7. However, I think you and I have different interpretations of the word 'only' ;) Thanks.
Regards,
Sam Tresler
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Jamie Holly wrote:
> A base install of D7 only has 75 tables.
>
> Jamie Holly
> http://www.intoxination.net
> http://www.hollyit.net
>
>
> On 12/6/2010 11:20 PM, Randy Fay wrote:
>> Poll module does not create tables unless it is enabled, and if you
>> uninstall it, it should delete them. If you don't use poll, and you
>> uninstall it before upgrading it, I don't think you'll see anything after
>> upgrade.
>>
>> If you once had it enabled, then the update would try to update it (I
>> think).
>>
>> My D7 blog (updated from D6) has 125 tables, including poll, poll_choices,
>> and poll_votes, which is a fairly normal number for a simple D7 site.
>>
>> -Randy
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Sam Tresler <sam at treslerdesigns.com
>> <mailto:sam at treslerdesigns.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Discussions about shared vs. dedicated hosting aside...
>>
>> Why does a default Drupal "install" create all the tables for all
>> the core modules at once, as opposed to when the modules are
>> enabled? Maybe this has changed and I should go look again, but
>> it seems to me that I have a lot of Drupal sites with, for example:
>>
>> | poll | | poll_choices | |
>> poll_votes |
>>
>> tables that I have never once used.
>>
>> Is there a reason these aren't enabled on demand as opposed to on
>> install?
>>
>> -Sam
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Randy Fay wrote:
>>
>> It's my oft-stated opinion that no non-trivial site will ever
>> live happily
>> for long on shared hosting. Trivial sites do fine. I have my
>> D7 blog on
>> Dreamhost, which has unlimited everything. But you see, it's
>> not really
>> unlimited, because they kill long-running processes, etc.,
>> etc. So it's
>> fine for a site that does not have many visitors or lots of
>> modules.
>> Dreamhost and some other hosts are even fine where you have
>> lots and lots of
>> databases or files. But it's the actual use where they get you.
>>
>> -Randy
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Shai Gluskin
>> <shai at content2zero.com <mailto:shai at content2zero.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> Kudos to you for finding a shared host where you can get
>> decent
>> performance, from your perspective, for such a set-up.
>>
>> I just had one bad experience after another with Drupal on
>> shared hosting.
>> I finally caved and got a dedicated box with support.
>>
>> The amount I pay for a dedicated server is paid back to me
>> many times in
>> therapy bills I save.
>>
>> In my case, I was always yelling at the shared host for
>> lousy performance
>> before they would come to me complaining I'm using too
>> many resources. But
>> all the power to ya' if you and your clients have been happy.
>>
>> The host coming after you, however, is to be expected.
>>
>> best,
>>
>> Shai
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:24 PM, <jeff at ayendesigns.com
>> <mailto:jeff at ayendesigns.com>> wrote:
>>
>> For those who don't have the few minutes: it's an
>> expression of joy!
>>
>>
>> On 12/06/2010 03:17 PM, Steve Edwards wrote:
>>
>> As I side note, I just spent a few minutes
>> googling the phrase "chuffed
>> to mint balls", since I had never heard that
>> before. Thanks for adding that
>> phrase to the collective Drupal vocabulary, Jeff. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Randy Fay
>> Drupal Module and Site Development
>> randy at randyfay.com <mailto:randy at randyfay.com>
>> +1 970.462.7450
>>
>>
>> Sam Tresler
>> 646-246-8403
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Randy Fay
>> Drupal Module and Site Development
>> randy at randyfay.com <mailto:randy at randyfay.com>
>> +1 970.462.7450
>>
>
Sam Tresler
646-246-8403
More information about the development
mailing list