[documentation] Drupal enhancement proposals (DEP)
Benjamin Melançon
pwgdarchive at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 11:10:32 UTC 2007
My argument is that the "way the internet works" is that once
something is up, it should stay up. We can't control who has linked
to it.
And happily, the way Drupal works is that it doesn't care where
something is, so the nodes could returned sectionless or unlinked to,
and virtually undiscoverable except by search engines.
I'm getting 'access denied' and not 'page not found' so I'm guessing
they were unpublished rather than deleted.
For best results, if not too hard, throw on top: "This section is
closed. Issue queues and the email lists to generate consensuses and
people actually doing work have been far more successful in the
community."
I'm not questioning taking them out of the handbook and ending the
whole experiment at all, but for instance there's fairly
useful-looking discussion about location and time zones there that I
wanted to link to from the location and mapping group on g.d.o.
Thanks,
benjamin
Agaric Design Collective
http:/AgaricDesign.com/
On 11/1/07, Steven Peck <sepeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> None of the DEP proposals were ever acted on. Most were several years
> old and dead ends. Issue queues and the email lists to generate
> consensuses and people actually doing work have been far more
> successful in the community.
>
> This was part of the rather ruthless clean up I have been going
> through in preparation for D6 and the general ongoing re-org.
>
> If there are any links still pointing to the we need to get that
> cleaned up. Also need to to re-explain the process for working on
> things in the community.
>
> On 10/31/07, Benjamin Melançon <pwgdarchive at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Doc team,
> >
> > All of the Drupal enhancement proposals (DEP) in the handbook have
> > been replaced with access denied.
> >
> > http://drupal.org/node/39407
> >
> > I'm not saying these pages should be part of the handbook, but they
> > certainly shouldn't be taken off the public internet and replaced with
> > broken links-- should they?
> >
> > benjamin
> > Agaric Design Collective
> > http:/AgaricDesign.com/
> > --
> > Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> > List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
> >
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>
More information about the documentation
mailing list