On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:35 +0100, Dries Buytaert wrote:
On 06 Mar 2006, at 18:31, qomo wrote:
Karoly, thanks for writing down your criteria for critical bugs. Dries wrote that we are up to 18 critical bugs again from 13. I've said what I think could be done about this.
I think some users, perhaps 85%, will change their postings if guidelines are posted and they find what they considered critical isn't.
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority. That said, writing down the definition of a critical bug is a good idea nonetheless. (Didn't we do that already?)
It was chiseled in stone, but Moses hid the tablets...