Re: 18 critical bugs left
Karoly et al, Karoly, thanks for writing down your criteria for critical bugs. Dries wrote that we are up to 18 critical bugs again from 13. I've said what I think could be done about this. I think some users, perhaps 85%, will change their postings if guidelines are posted and they find what they considered critical isn't. Ann
On 06 Mar 2006, at 18:31, qomo wrote:
Karoly, thanks for writing down your criteria for critical bugs. Dries wrote that we are up to 18 critical bugs again from 13. I've said what I think could be done about this.
I think some users, perhaps 85%, will change their postings if guidelines are posted and they find what they considered critical isn't.
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority. That said, writing down the definition of a critical bug is a good idea nonetheless. (Didn't we do that already?) -- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:35 +0100, Dries Buytaert wrote:
On 06 Mar 2006, at 18:31, qomo wrote:
Karoly, thanks for writing down your criteria for critical bugs. Dries wrote that we are up to 18 critical bugs again from 13. I've said what I think could be done about this.
I think some users, perhaps 85%, will change their postings if guidelines are posted and they find what they considered critical isn't.
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority. That said, writing down the definition of a critical bug is a good idea nonetheless. (Didn't we do that already?)
It was chiseled in stone, but Moses hid the tablets...
participants (4)
-
Darrel O'Pry -
Dries Buytaert -
Michelangelo Partipilo -
qomo