7 Mar
2006
7 Mar
'06
11:08 a.m.
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:51:58 +0100, Dries Buytaert <dries.buytaert@gmail.com> wrote:
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority.
that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the "critcical bugs pov". however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical?
No thousands of normal bugs, last I checked there were less (far less) than a thousand.