RE: [development] Re: 18 critical bugs left
-----Original Message----- From: development-bounces@drupal.org
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority.
that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the "critcical bugs pov". however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical? -- groets bertb
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority.
that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the "critcical bugs pov". however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical?
Good point. No one has an answer for that but it is probably safe to assume that critical bugs bubble to the top. :-) -- Dries Buytaert :: http://buytaert.net/
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:51:58 +0100, Dries Buytaert <dries.buytaert@gmail.com> wrote:
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority.
that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the "critcical bugs pov". however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical?
No thousands of normal bugs, last I checked there were less (far less) than a thousand.
On 3/7/06, Karoly Negyesi <karoly@negyesi.net> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:51:58 +0100, Dries Buytaert <dries.buytaert@gmail.com> wrote:
If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re- categorize those that have the wrong priority.
that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the "critcical bugs pov". however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical?
No thousands of normal bugs, last I checked there were less (far less) than a thousand.
Currently 371 critical+normal - and I agree that most reporters debating between critical and normal submit it as critical. There are occasionally the reverse cases (e.g. 13148, 52182, etc.) but they are less common. Greg
only 7 critical issues that are not RTBC status. i see no reaason why these can't be closed in next 48 hours. http://drupal.org/project/issues?projects=3060&versions=10195,9902,9842,9753...
Moshe Weitzman wrote:
only 7 critical issues that are not RTBC status. i see no reaason why these can't be closed in next 48 hours.
http://drupal.org/project/issues?projects=3060&versions=10195,9902,9842,9753...
When will be 4.7.0 released? Did you consider making one more RC release, beta6, before releasing stable version? I think it should be good... Thanks, Jakub -- Jakub Suchý <jakub.suchy@logios.cz>
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:46 +0100, Jakub Suchy wrote:
Moshe Weitzman wrote:
only 7 critical issues that are not RTBC status. i see no reaason why these can't be closed in next 48 hours.
http://drupal.org/project/issues?projects=3060&versions=10195,9902,9842,9753...
When will be 4.7.0 released? Did you consider making one more RC release, beta6, before releasing stable version? I think it should be good...
Thanks, Jakub
Jakub, I think the plan is when all the crit bugs are closed we'll roll an RC, and release it to the world. Then we'll have another round of bug fixes. You may see a release after that... but as people keep saying... 4.7 will be released when its done. If you want to help please look for bugs / confirm bugs / write patches review patches which ever you prefer. :)
participants (7)
-
Boerland, Bert -
Darrel O'Pry -
Dries Buytaert -
Greg Knaddison -
Jakub Suchy -
Karoly Negyesi -
Moshe Weitzman