the also shows something more (to me) * People look for image support [1] * People are looking for old-fashioned publishing mostly (vs technocrati, syndication, flickr integration) * We should evaluate how we can support (*not ship*) wysiwig editing best. Or at least see if core is limiting the use of them, in for example filters or even hooks (user feedback is not too positive on drupals WYSIWYG abilities) [1] Some more detailed questions could be * Did users find the image functionality they needed, or did they download all three indicate that they apperantly were not satisfied with theyr first and hop over to the second, rather. * Are users looking for advanced or simple image stuff (too many users rant about the "cleanness" of image module in forums etc. They want gallery2 alike bloat, so it seems sometimes) * What can we do (in early 4.7) to make sure we have the right (combination of, or recipe for) contribs around that together make a perfect image experience. Ber On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:49:00PM +0200, Dries Buytaert wrote:
Hello world,
attached is a list of the top 15 downloaded contrib modules. It represents the modules we should update as soon as possible. Upgrading these modules is important in order to get Drupal 4.7 (release candidates) tested.
1. image module --> 3695 downloads/month 2. gallery module 3. flexinode module 4. tinymce 5. event module 6. fckeditor module 7. img_assist module 8. article module 9. ecommerce module 10. filemanager module 11. album module 12. front module 13. theme_editor module 14. banner module 15. gsitemap module
-- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/