On 17-Aug-05, at 7:39 AM, James Walker wrote:
On 17-Aug-05, at 9:58 AM, Dries Buytaert wrote:
What, patches that aren't in the patch queue?
i believe they're in the queue... I'll double check with Richard (as he's the one who filed 'em).
They're in the queue. Also, I'm less interested in the current aggregator (which uses non-standard categories and lots of other stuff) than I am in aggregator2 (feeds AND. I've just pinged the author again, and hopefully we'll get a commit, otherwise I'll just commit the version I have as a zip.
- enhance aggregator.module so that it lets each user manage his own feeds, and read his own articles. the aggregator should keep track of what has been read and not read for each user.
Karoly, I'm definitely interested in "user feeds", and I think that would make sense to make part of the current aggregator. The way I see it, the current aggregator becomes optimized for reading and multi-user, and aggregator2 is basically for content syndication directly between sites -- I actually pinged Jon VanDyke about this, since it seems to tie into publish/subscribe. -- Boris Mann http://www.bmannconsulting.com