Op 12-apr-05 om 0:31 heeft Chris Messina het volgende geschreven:
I disagree. The div is useful for getting around IE5 problems with padding.
Also, this div shouldn't be nixed unless you're going to be thorough and junk *all* "extraneous" divs in Drupal. Themers rely on such things (SFX would break, for example), so changing standard div usage is a big decision.
"menu" also makes more sense for most people -- especially since it could be styled horizontally and completely *unlike* a tree.
My two cents.
Chris
On 4/7/05, Steven Wittens <steven@acko.net> wrote:
The class should be on the <ul> instead.
Steven Wittens
I would really like to remove all extraneous divs and implement the theme('box')-approach, mentioned on the Drupal Conference by Ber Kessels.. I think that adding classes to elements other than a <div> should is good, because you do not use more markup than absolutely needed. I think it would also be a good idea to completely minimize the drupal.css. We should get rid of all eye-candy things, and only leave in there which is _really_ important, or make it overrideable.. (Steven, I know your answer! ;-) At last, i don't see what the problem is between applied CSS against a <ul>-element or <div>. With both approaches we can do exactly the same things, and can get the same results. I truly think that the less html-markup we have in our code, the better it is.. And, _every_ piece of HTML should be overridable inside the theme. So, imo breaking the themes for the introduction drupal 4.7 shouldn't be a big problem, but I would like to know how you guys think of that.. Kind regards, Stefan