A quick observation here, and feel free to flame this mercilessly [1]. As I see it, the purpose of the review of application should be to determine whether the applicant will comply with the d.o requirements regarding licensing, etc -- it should *not* be to judge the merits of the proposed module. In this case, and in others I have seen, people have been unnecessarily hassled during the CVS application process. As a community, we are shooting ourselves in the foot if we hassle/turn away developers, especially when we are turning them away for invalid reasons. If Andrew hadn't posted to the Dev list, his good idea would not have had the opportunity to make it into the community. I wonder how many other good ideas have been lost for the exact same reason. Cheers, Bill [1]. Yes, I know that there are a small number of people triaging a large number of CVS applications. Andrew Schulman wrote:
You could always build it out as a contrib module, though. It sounds pretty useful. Thanks. Unfortunately, when I tried that the CVS masters said that my proposed module was "too simple" to justify granting me an account (http://drupal.org/node/606962).
This has been rectified.
Cheers, Gerhard
Thank you. Andrew.