% > It might. But I like the direction that is going where % > it allows for taxonomies and then subselects of taxonomies % > that are shared (http://www.drupal.org/taxonomy/horses+cars)
% Well, the above poses a problem. Your URL is passing "horses cars" into % Drupal. Should Drupal treat that as two terms, or one term? And what about % horse+riding? chocolate+pebbles? frosted+flakes? Two terms or one?
In my mind, I was seeing the "+" as a marker for two terms. would & be better?
No - that's an even MORE insidious bug. Because when you ask for http://www.drupal.org/taxonomy/horses&cars with "Clean URLs" on, it turns into something like ?q=taxonomy/horses&cars, which means that a new GET parameter called "cars", with no value, is created. Certainly not what you intend. I think people have tried %26 in Drupal too (the decimal encoding of &), and there was a further problem with that. -- Morbus Iff ( you are nothing without your robot car, NOTHING! ) Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/ Spidering Hacks: http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596005776/disobeycom icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus